Category: Regulation

  • AI Camera Glitch: Thousands of NYC Drivers Hit with False Parking Tickets

    AI Camera Glitch: Thousands of NYC Drivers Hit with False Parking Tickets

    In an effort to enhance public transportation efficiency, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) of New York City implemented artificial intelligence (AI)-powered cameras on select bus routes to monitor and penalize vehicles obstructing bus lanes. However, a recent malfunction in this system led to approximately 3,800 erroneous parking violations issued to drivers, including over 870 who were legally parked.

    Read Also: Texas Doesn’t Want Automakers Sharing Your Driving Data With Insurance Companies

    The AI cameras, installed on the M79 and Bx35 bus routes, were designed to identify and ticket vehicles blocking bus lanes. Due to programming errors, the cameras failed to recognize legal parking zones and the designated warning phases for new enforcement areas. Consequently, drivers like George Han received multiple unjustified tickets despite adhering to parking regulations. Han noted, “At first I wasn’t worried, because I know the parking rules and these are legal spots… It turns out that the tickets kept coming though. We are up to about ten now.”

    The MTA acknowledged these errors, attributing them to “programming kinks” in mapping curb areas and timing of warnings. Tim Minton, the MTA’s Communications Director, stated, “One of the purposes of the warning phase for newly activated routes is to work out any issues before anyone is actually ticketed… In this situation, there were programming kinks, both in mapping of curb areas and the timing of warnings themselves — all of which have now been resolved.”

    Read Also: California Passes Law Mandating New Cars to Alert Drivers When Exceeding the Speed Limit

    In response, the MTA has reversed all 3,800 mistaken violations and is refunding any payments made. The software issues have been corrected to prevent future inaccuracies. Despite this setback, the MTA reports that since the implementation of the AI camera enforcement, bus speeds have increased by approximately 5%, indicating improved efficiency in public transportation.

    This incident underscores the challenges of integrating AI technology into urban infrastructure. While automation offers potential benefits in monitoring and enforcement, ensuring accuracy and reliability is crucial to maintain public trust and avoid undue penalties on law-abiding citizens.

    The MTA’s experience serves as a reminder of the importance of thorough testing and oversight when deploying AI systems in public services. As cities continue to adopt smart technologies, balancing innovation with meticulous implementation is essential to achieve the desired outcomes without unintended consequences.

  • Texas Doesn’t Want Automakers Sharing Your Driving Data With Insurance Companies

    Texas Doesn’t Want Automakers Sharing Your Driving Data With Insurance Companies

    Modern vehicles are equipped with advanced technology capable of collecting extensive data about the car, driver, and environment. This data collection has raised significant privacy concerns as automakers have been found selling this information without proper consent, prompting an investigation by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

    Paxton’s office announced an investigation into unnamed car manufacturers under the state’s Deceptive Trade Practices—Consumer Protection Act. This act empowers the attorney general to scrutinize companies for engaging in false, misleading, or deceptive practices. The investigation aims to determine whether these automakers collected and sold driver data without proper authorization or notification to the vehicle owners.

    Read Also: Two Michigan Companies Fined $10M for Selling Emissions Defeat Devices

    Paxton emphasized the invasive and disturbing nature of unauthorized data collection and stressed the necessity for a thorough investigation and appropriate enforcement measures. This probe is further supported by a new data privacy law set to take effect in Texas on July 1, reinforcing the state’s commitment to protecting consumer privacy.

    According to a report by The Record, Paxton’s office issued “civil investigation demand” letters in April to at least four automakers—Kia, General Motors (GM), Subaru, and Mitsubishi. The letters requested detailed information on how these companies disclosed their data collection practices to customers and to whom they sold the data.

    The investigation follows a revelation by The New York Times in March that highlighted how GM, Kia, Subaru, and Mitsubishi shared driver data with an insurance portal, leading to increased insurance rates for some GM drivers. Additionally, U.S. lawmakers have accused other major automakers, including Toyota, BMW, Nissan, Mazda, and Mercedes-Benz, of sharing vehicle location data with law enforcement without a warrant or court order, further fueling privacy concerns.

    The data collected by modern vehicles is extensive. Cars can record and transmit information about speed, braking patterns, duration of attention to infotainment screens, and much more. The concern over this data being shared without consent has sparked a broader conversation about the role of automobiles in the surveillance state.

    Read Also: Auto industry risks security breaches by underpaying white hat hackers

    While Texas is only one state, its size and influence, akin to that of California, give its actions significant weight in the automotive industry. The outcome of this investigation could have far-reaching implications, potentially leading to stricter regulations and greater protections for vehicle owners’ privacy across the country.

    In conclusion, the investigation led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton underscores the urgent need for transparency and accountability in how automakers handle and share driver data. As technology continues to evolve, so too must the laws and regulations that protect consumer privacy, ensuring that individuals retain control over their personal information in an increasingly connected world.

    This case serves as a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over data privacy, setting the stage for potential reforms that could safeguard consumers from unauthorized data exploitation by automakers and other corporations. The automotive industry, consumers, and privacy advocates alike will be closely watching the developments in Texas, hoping for outcomes that reinforce the importance of consent and transparency in data practices.

  • California Passes Law Mandating New Cars to Alert Drivers When Exceeding the Speed Limit

    California Passes Law Mandating New Cars to Alert Drivers When Exceeding the Speed Limit

     

     

    By the end of the decade, cars in California might alert you if you exceed the speed limit. Recently, the state’s Senate passed new legislation requiring all vehicles sold or manufactured in California to have passive speed limiters starting in 2027. The legislation sets forth that half of all new vehicles must have this technology by 2029, with full compliance required by 2032.

    The proposed passive system, exempting emergency vehicles, will alert drivers when they exceed the road’s speed limit by 10 miles per hour. This system will issue both audible and visual warnings to prompt drivers to slow down. This new regulation follows a recommendation from the US National Transportation Safety Board, which advised the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to mandate intelligent speed assistant (ISA) technology in new cars to warn drivers of speeding. For the legislation to become law, it must still pass a vote in the California Assembly by August 31.

    The primary goal of this legislation is to reduce speeding-related crashes and fatalities. Statistics show that one-third of California’s traffic deaths from 2017 to 2021 were due to speeding. The bill’s sponsor, Scott Wiener, emphasized that these deaths are preventable and pointed out that policy choices have allowed these tragedies to continue.

    Intelligent Speed Assistants (ISAs) have been available in both passive and active forms since their introduction in France in the 1980s. Passive systems do not prevent drivers from exceeding the speed limit but provide warnings, while active systems physically limit vehicle speeds, making it difficult or impossible to go over the limit.

    Read Also: Cummins Faces $2 Billion Fine for Violating Diesel Emissions Standards

    California’s law, SB 961, mirrors a rule set to take effect in the European Union, requiring all cars sold in the region to have passive limiters that alert drivers both audibly and visually. In line with these safety measures, Volvo announced in 2020 that it would voluntarily limit its new vehicles’ top speed to 112 mph.

    The push for speed limiters in vehicles is part of a broader movement towards enhancing road safety and reducing traffic fatalities. California’s proposed legislation aims to align with global efforts to make roads safer by leveraging technology to assist drivers in adhering to speed limits.

    The introduction of passive speed limiters is seen as a critical step in mitigating the risks associated with speeding. These systems rely on GPS data and digital maps to determine the speed limit of a given road. When a driver exceeds the speed limit by more than 10 mph, the system activates and warns the driver to reduce speed. This technological intervention is designed to reduce human error and promote safer driving habits.

    Supporters of the bill argue that the implementation of passive speed limiters will have a significant impact on road safety. By reducing instances of speeding, the likelihood of accidents decreases, leading to fewer injuries and fatalities. This aligns with the broader objective of Vision Zero, a multi-national road traffic safety project that aims to achieve a highway system with no fatalities or serious injuries.

    Critics, however, express concerns about the effectiveness and acceptance of such technology. Some drivers may find the alerts intrusive and may not respond positively to constant warnings. Additionally, there is the challenge of ensuring that the technology is reliable and accurate in real-time conditions. Misinformation about speed limits or GPS inaccuracies could potentially lead to false alerts, causing frustration among drivers.

    Read Also: US Lawmakers Propose Legislation Forcing Automakers To Keep AM Radio

    Despite these concerns, the precedent set by the European Union and the proactive measures taken by manufacturers like Volvo indicate a growing acceptance of speed limiters in the automotive industry. As technology advances, the reliability and user experience of these systems are expected to improve, addressing some of the current criticisms.

    The implementation of passive speed limiters also represents a shift towards greater regulatory involvement in vehicle safety standards. By mandating such technologies, California aims to create a safer driving environment and reduce the societal costs associated with traffic accidents. This legislative move underscores the state’s commitment to innovative solutions in addressing traffic safety challenges.

    Moreover, the potential benefits extend beyond safety. Improved compliance with speed limits can lead to more efficient traffic flow, reduced fuel consumption, and lower emissions. These environmental advantages align with California’s broader goals of sustainability and reducing the carbon footprint of transportation.

    As the August 31 deadline approaches for the California Assembly vote, the eyes of the nation are on this pioneering legislation. If passed, it could set a new standard for vehicle safety regulations in the United States, encouraging other states to adopt similar measures.

    The proposed legislation requiring passive speed limiters in California represents a significant step towards enhancing road safety. By 2027, all vehicles sold or manufactured in the state may include technology designed to alert drivers when they exceed the speed limit. This initiative, driven by the need to reduce speeding-related accidents and fatalities, aligns with global trends in vehicle safety. While there are challenges and criticisms to address, the potential benefits in terms of safety, efficiency, and environmental impact make a compelling case for the adoption of this technology. As California leads the way, the successful implementation of passive speed limiters could pave the path for broader national and international adoption, contributing to safer roads and better driving practices worldwide.

  • Cummins Faces $2 Billion Fine for Violating Diesel Emissions Standards

    Cummins Faces $2 Billion Fine for Violating Diesel Emissions Standards

    Cummins will have to recall and repair around 630,000 Ram volley exchanges after reaching a agreement with the US government for violating the Clean Air Act. Authorities discovered that the machine maker was using illegal software to circumvent diesel emigrations tests, and the company will have to pay further than$ 2 billion in penalties and pollution remediation.

    Read Also: Two Michigan Companies Fined $10M for Selling Emissions Defeat Devices

    The recall program requires Cummins to remove all defeat bias installed in the exchanges and replace the vehicles ’ software, which the company has formerly demonstrated workshop to the US Environmental Protection Agency. The recall involves 2013 through 2019 Ram 2500 and 3500 diesel volley exchanges with an machine from Cummins, but the compass is sporadic. It affects 2013- 2015 exchanges with the two- detector picky catalytic reduction regulator, all 2016- 2019 Cummins- equipped Ram pickups, and all 2019 Ram 2500s and 3500s erected before October 1. Vehicle possessors have entered or should soon be entering a recall notice. Ram dealers will modernize the software, and Cummins will give an extended bond for the corridor and software for the affected vehicles.

    Read Also: 2024 Ram Rampage Initial Batch Sells Out In 28 Minutes

    Cummins is just the rearmost in the bus assiduity to face discipline for its emigrations software. The Volkswagen Dieselgate reproach that broke in 2015 brought violent, worldwide scrutiny to vehicles with diesel machines. The failure cost VW$4.3 billion. Fiat Chrysler motorcars and Daimler also faced penalties for having vehicles with bad software.

    Featured Image Credit: www.motor1.com

  • Utah Department of Transportation Launches GPS-Based Road Usage Charging Pilot Program

    Utah Department of Transportation Launches GPS-Based Road Usage Charging Pilot Program

    The Utah Department of Transportation, in collaboration with ETAN Tolling Technology and ClearRoad, is launching the Local Road Usage Charging and Tolling Integration Pilot to test a new method of charging drivers for their road usage. The pilot program will use GPS technology to monitor vehicles’ locations and bill owners based on their road usage. This initiative is scheduled to begin before the end of the year and will run for six months with approximately 100 volunteers participating.

    The test will take place in medium-sized cities, including Ogden, St. George, Saratoga Springs, and South Jordan, with populations ranging from about 50,000 to less than 100,000 people. The project is funded by a federal grant.

    Read Also: Audi Q6 E-Tron: Unveiling Active Lighting Technology for Safer Driving, but Not in the US

    Utah already has a Road Usage Charge program specifically for electric vehicles (EVs). EV owners can voluntarily enroll in the program or pay a flat fee of $130.25 for 2023. Participants install a device into their vehicle’s OBD port and set up an account on an app, with the charge being one cent per mile on top of the flat fee.

    The integration of GPS technology in the pilot program adds precision to the existing road usage charge by accurately tracking where people drive. It enables the state to bill drivers appropriately, such as for toll roads. Additionally, the system will detect when drivers use locally-owned roads, allowing revenue allocation to the correct municipality responsible for maintaining that specific highway.

    The aim of this pilot program is to unify different forms of road pricing, including tolling, local road usage charging, and distance-based road usage charges, into a single account management and billing system. This will provide participants with a more seamless experience and optimize payment methods and wallet management for road use charging programs.

    Read Also: NHTSA Wants Auto Emergency Braking Standard On Big Trucks, Buses

    ClearRoad, which previously worked on Oregon’s OReGO road use charging program and partnered on a pilot program for testing congestion charges in Bogota, Columbia, will be involved in this project.

    The results of the feasibility study will determine whether the Utah Department of Transportation will implement this new road usage charging program for drivers in the state. The goal is to gather valuable insights and technology options to inform a final report to be provided to the Federal Highway Administration at the end of the pilot, approximately a year from its commencement.

    Featured Image Credit: www.motor1.com

  • Audi Q6 E-Tron: Unveiling Active Lighting Technology for Safer Driving, but Not in the US

    Audi Q6 E-Tron: Unveiling Active Lighting Technology for Safer Driving, but Not in the US

     

    The highly anticipated Audi Q6 E-Tron is set to hit the market with cutting-edge active lighting technology, making it smarter and safer on the roads. However, to the disappointment of many US drivers, this advanced feature will not be available in the United States. Instead of blaming Audi, let’s explore the real reason behind this limitation: federal red tape.

    Adaptive Matrix LED Headlights: An Evolutionary Safety Feature

    Audi has long been at the forefront of automotive safety, equipping its vehicles with adaptive matrix LED headlights. These innovative headlights can intelligently adjust their brightness when they detect oncoming light, ensuring maximum visibility for the driver without blinding other motorists. This technology has been included in some Audi models sold in the US for nearly a decade, but strangely, the feature has been deactivated.

    The Regulatory Hurdle: ADB Lighting and Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108

    In February 2022, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) made an amendment to Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108, allowing adaptive driving beam (ADB) lighting similar to Audi’s matrix LED technology. However, rather than facilitating the integration of these advanced systems, the amendment complicated matters. The new regulation introduced different testing and certification requirements, deviating from the globally accepted and Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) informed solution.

    Audi’s Explanation: Differing Requirements and Complications

    Audi clarified the situation, explaining that the US had a previous regulation permitting only high or low beams with nothing in between. The new regulation allowed for adaptive beam lighting, but the revised testing procedures and criteria posed a challenge. As a result, Audi’s solution, which has been used successfully outside the US since 2012, does not align with the stringent requirements of the new regulation.

    Read Also: Former Audi CEO Fined $1.2M, Gets Suspended Sentence For Dieselgate Role

    Safety Group Warnings Ignored

    Interestingly, safety groups had cautioned NHTSA against these complications years ago. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety raised concerns in a 2018 petition, warning that certain components of the amendment could hinder the full potential of ADB systems in maximizing visibility while minimizing glare.

    The Exciting Advancements in Audi Q6 E-Tron’s Lighting Technology

    Despite the limitations faced in the US, the Audi Q6 E-Tron remains an exciting model with significant advancements in lighting technology. Building upon Audi’s matrix-beam technology, the Q6 E-Tron offers active lighting with eight different front running light designs, some of which feature a subtle twinkling effect, creating a unique and captivating look.

    The Safety Angle: Intelligent Navigation and Parking Alerts

    Beyond aesthetics, the active lighting feature also enhances safety. The Q6 E-Tron’s navigation system can detect traffic jams or accidents ahead and change the rear OLED display to show a warning triangle, alerting drivers behind to the potential hazard. Additionally, when the car is in automated parallel parking mode, the taillights will display a specific signature along with the blinker, signaling that the vehicle is backing into a parking space.

    Read Also: High-Performance Audi A6 E-Tron Spied Testing At The Nürburgring

    The Future Possibilities for US-Spec Audi Q6 E-Tron

    While US-spec Q6 E-Tron models will have static LED running light signatures, Audi holds hope for the future. If the US evolves its lighting standards to align with international norms, Audi can activate the full matrix feature set for thousands of vehicles, including older models.

    The Audi Q6 E-Tron introduces remarkable active lighting technology, enhancing both aesthetics and safety on the roads. However, the absence of this feature in the US is a result of regulatory complexities. While Audi remains committed to bringing advanced lighting capabilities to its vehicles in the US, it awaits the day when federal standards align with global norms, enabling American drivers to experience the full potential of Audi’s matrix LED technology. Until then, the Audi Q6 E-Tron still offers a plethora of exciting features and represents a step towards a safer and smarter future on the roads.

    Featured Image Credit: www.motor1.com

  • Paris To Fight Pollution With Higher Parking Fees For SUVs

    Paris To Fight Pollution With Higher Parking Fees For SUVs

    SUVs are generally larger, heavier, and thirstier vehicles than hatchbacks, sedans, and even station wagons. Paris, the capital of France, sees them as one of the main sources of air pollution in the city and is planning to impose higher parking tariffs on what we call sport utility vehicles. The size, weight, and engine of the vehicle will be taken into account when calculating the fees.

    The Guardian reports that the measure was approved by Paris councilors last month. The EELV ecology party proposed the new law saying the number of SUVs in Paris has increased by about 60 percent in the last four years. Still, they make up only around 15 percent of the city’s total fleet of approximately 1.15 million private vehicles.

    “We would like the city of Paris to change the pricing of paid parking to make it progressive according to the weight and size of vehicles,” Frédéric Badina-Serpette, a councilor from the EELV, commented. “The aim is to focus on an absurdity: auto-besity … the inexorable growth in the weight and size of vehicles circulating in our cities, and particularly in Paris.”

    The new rule is expected to become effective from January 1 next year when SUV owners will start paying higher parking fees. However, electric vehicles and vehicles of large families are expected to be excluded from the measure, though details of the charges and how SUVs will be categorized are not known at the moment. 

    Just earlier this year, the city of Lyon introduced a similar new law that will go into effect next year. France’s third-largest city announced a new parking policy, under which parking fees in public areas will be determined on a progressive basis based on the vehicle’s size, weight, and engine.

    However, electric vehicles will qualify for the lowest parking fees of $16,50 (15 euros) per month, while combustion-powered vehicles that weigh more than 3,803 pounds (1,725 kilograms) will pay triple. Grenoble, a city with a population of around 450,000 people, is also expected to introduce a similar policy soon.

    Source link

  • Former Audi CEO Fined $1.2M, Gets Suspended Sentence For Dieselgate Role

    Former Audi CEO Fined $1.2M, Gets Suspended Sentence For Dieselgate Role

    Last month, former Audi CEO Rupert Stadler confessed to his involvement in the Dieselgate scandal in order to avoid receiving a prison sentence. Today, a Munich court handed down a verdict in the case, fining Stadler for over one million euros while giving him a suspended sentence of one year and nine months.

    When Stadler agreed to confess in May, he had also agreed to pay a fine that Prosecutors had wanted to be as high as €2 million. However, the judge determined he would only have to pay €1.1 million ($1.2 million at today’s exchange rate). Authorities arrested Stadler in 2018, who has been on trial since 2020 for his role in the scandal that first emerged in September 2015.

    That’s when the US Environmental Protection Agency announced it had discovered that Volkswagen had violated the Clean Air Act. It wouldn’t be until November 2016 that the agency implicated Audi. The German automaker used software to circumvent US emissions tests on its diesel vehicles.

    Stadler is the first Volkswagen board member sentenced for the scandal. However, other employees were also sentenced this week. Judges handed verdicts to former Audi executive Wolfgang Hatz and an engineer for their involvement, also subjecting the pair to fines and suspended sentences. Pending cases include those against former VW boss Martin Winterkorn and other former VW managers.

    The scandal has also proven costly for the automaker. Volkswagen Group’s actions have led to it being fined billions in the US and other countries where it sold its defective vehicles. South Korea recently fined Audi, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Volkswagen for colluding to cheat the country’s emissions standards.

    Audi is doing all it can to put the scandal behind it with its push into electric vehicles even as it lags behind the competition. VW Group CEO Oliver Blume said last week that he wants to speed up EV development for the brand, which has faced “severe software problems” and plagued more than Audi. Next year, the company will launch the Q6 E-Tron while riding on a new platform and its last combustion-powered car in 2025.

    Source link

  • NHTSA Wants Auto Emergency Braking Standard On Big Trucks, Buses

    NHTSA Wants Auto Emergency Braking Standard On Big Trucks, Buses

    Last month, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposed a new rule that would mandate automatic emergency braking (AEB) on passenger vehicles. The agency is expanding its scope by proposing the same rule for heavy-duty trucks and buses – vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating of over 10,000 pounds.

    NHTSA estimates the technology could save 155 lives a year while preventing 8,814 injuries. The agency’s data says that approximately 60,000 heavy-duty vehicles are involved in rear-end crashes, and the technology could prevent over 19,000 of them annually.

    The technology for passenger vehicles would see a similar increase in safety. The agency believes that requiring the technology could save a minimum of 340 lives a year and reduce injuries by 24,000 cars. The proposed rule would require the system to work on all passenger vehicles up to 62 miles per hour. NHTSA’s rule for heavy-duty vehicles would require the AEB system to work between 6 and 50 mph.

    A 2022 Insurance Institute for Highway Safety study found that pickup trucks with the technology had a 43 percent lower rate of causing rear-end collisions. Injuries were also reduced by 42 percent. The study also discovered that only eight percent of all registered pickups on the road in 2021 came equipped with AEB. However, the good news is that new full-size trucks from Ford, Chevrolet, GMC, Ram, Toyota, Nissan, and Honda offer standard-issue AEB systems.

    While the technology saves lives and reduces injuries, another IIHS study also found that vehicles with crash prevention technology like AEB are more finicky to repair. The institute’s research discovered that about half of those surveyed still had problems with these features after completing repairs. This makes these crucial systems less reliable and could lead to increased costs to fix down the road.

    The proposal for both passenger cars and heavy-duty vehicles would go into effect three years after a final ruling is made on the two rules. NHTSA has not mentioned when a final verdict could happen, so customers might not see any changes in new vehicles, big or small, for several years, as automakers continue to increase standard safety features in new models.

    Source link

  • Feds Fault NHTSA On Failure To Meet Deadlines For Safety Investigations

    Feds Fault NHTSA On Failure To Meet Deadlines For Safety Investigations

    [ad_1]

    The US Transportation Department released a report this week that revealed deficiencies in how the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration handles investigations. These findings show that the NHTSA does not consistently document information and routinely fails to complete defect investigations in a timely manner.   

    For the report, auditors from the US Transportation Department’s Office of Inspector General conducted a two-year investigation, reviewing a sample of NHTSA investigations conducted from 2018 to 2021. The goal was to determine if the NHTSA has the necessary resources, tools, and processes effectively conduct investigations and identify safety concerns.  

    Internally, the NHTSA’s goal is to complete a preliminary investigation within 120 days, with a full engineering analysis and recall determination following in less than 365 days. The audit sampled 35 investigations from 2018 to 2021, revealing that 33 of those investigations, or 94 percent, did not meet those deadlines. On average, preliminary evaluations took 617 days, with the engineering analysis requiring over 1,000 days to complete.  

    Additional findings revealed the agency does not consistently document information or follow its internal processes for opening and conducting investigations. In the same sample of cases, auditors determined that most investigations were missing files, including information requests and briefing documents, or did not follow the NHTSA’s internal processes and procedures. 

    According to the NHTSA, the issues were partially caused by limited resources to handle a high volume of information and correspondence. It also cited its decision-making, including review and approval processes, as reasons for delays. Additionally, despite efforts to modernize its systems and processes, the agency still relies on legacy information systems and inefficient processes to conduct its investigations. 

    The NHTSA has also not integrated its processes using a centralized data management system. As a result, information, including recalls, manufacturer communications, and other correspondence, is not consolidated as part of its investigations. This lack of integration resulted in missing documentation and a lack of key documentation required by federal law. 

    In its report, the US Department of Transportation outlined 12 recommendations for the NHTSA to improve its processes, including determining its realistic timeliness goals and revising them as necessary. The recommendations are considered “resolved but open pending implementation” by NHTSA. 

    NHTSA investigations primarily focus on US traffic safety, including reducing deaths caused by accidents or defects like faulty airbags. More recently, it has investigated the use of new technology, including autonomous driving and in-car video gaming

    [ad_2]

    Source link