Category: Auto News

  • Tsunoda: AlphaTauri F1 braking issues carried over from Gasly in 2022

    Tsunoda: AlphaTauri F1 braking issues carried over from Gasly in 2022

    [ad_1]

    Tsunoda had been well-placed to score points in the Monaco Grand Prix last month as he ran ninth with 20 laps to go. But in the final stages of the rain-hit race, he was passed by both McLarens and continued to slip down the order. He eventually finished in 15th as rookie team-mate Nyck de Vries grabbed 12th.

    The Japanese racer noticeably struggled with his brakes, voiced his complaints over team radio and ran off the track at Mirabeau as he struggled to manage temperatures. His brakes again caught the attention in Spain last weekend due to the excessive levels of dust they were producing when under heavy load.

    Asked by Autosport to explain the situation, Tsunoda said an “efficiency” issue that was exaggerated in wet conditions was long-running at AlphaTauri and had also blighted Alpine-bound Gasly during 2022.

    He said: “The brake issues we have are from probably last year. It happened more often towards Pierre rather than me. But this happens to me more [this season].

    “Literally, I don’t feel any efficiency from braking. It just doesn’t warm up, doesn’t feel any efficiency so you cannot push as much as I want to in the rain conditions.

    “Obviously, that makes the tyres colder, it just goes worse and worse.

    “[In Monaco] I had [problems] from FP1, which also affected my qualifying performance as well. 

    Yuki Tsunoda, AlphaTauri AT04

    Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

    “It’s a bit of a shame because I have to do extra build-up compared to other competitors just to warm the brakes, which is a bit unnecessary.”

    Tsunoda said the issue was solely a brake material hardware, rather than a calibration problem, that affected the cars independently of his particular driving style.

    He instead said it was “more towards the engineering side” when it came to finding a fix, which would enable him to move away from his current excessive use of engine braking to slow down.

    Tsunoda, who ranked 12th in Barcelona after serving a five-second penalty for forcing Zhou Guanyu off track, reckoned the team had made gains with the brakes across the double-header with Monaco.

    Read Also:

    He said: “We changed a little bit the brake approach to have more aggressive temperature and actually we had to slightly manage the brakes this time.

    “Actually, that was much better because efficiency was much better than Monaco.

    “I think the team did a good job and I’m pretty happy with it so we made a step.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Le Mans 24 Hours: Ferrari snatches lead from Toyota, drama for Porsche

    Le Mans 24 Hours: Ferrari snatches lead from Toyota, drama for Porsche

    [ad_1]

    The #8 Toyota had been at the head of the field as dawn broke at the Circuit de la Sarthe, but Ryo Hirakawa started to lose time with a damaged front splitter and a slow right-rear puncture to his hybrid-powered LMH contender.

    This brought the #51 Ferrari of Alessandro Pier Guidi into play, with the Italian rapidly closing an 11s gap with a series of rapid laps.

    Pier Guidi was able to bring himself right on the tail of Hirakawa but couldn’t make a move by the time the two drivers simultaneously headed to the pits at the end of lap 207.

    Toyota elected to change the front end of the #8 Toyota during the pitstop, which proved crucial in the battle for the lead as it allowed the #51 Ferrari now driven by James Calado to surge to the front.

    The gap between the two cars stood at five seconds after the pitstops, and Calado was able to extend that advantage to well over 13 seconds as the Ferrari enjoyed a pace advantage over the Toyota.

    During the next round of pitstops, Hirakawa took on new tyres while Calado continued on old rubber, with the gap between the two expanding to 25s as they rejoined the track.

    Using fresher tyres, Hirakawa was able to bring the deficit down to 20s but Calado maintained his own to maintain Ferrari’s advantage at the head of the field.

    #8 Toyota Gazoo Racing Toyota GR010 – Hybrid of Sebastien Buemi, Brendon Hartley, Ryo Hirakawa

    Photo by: Rainier Ehrhardt

    Calado and Hirakawa handed over their cars to Antonio Giovinazzi and Sebastien Buemi and, as the clock struck the 18th hour, Ferrari’s advantage had ballooned to nearly a minute, aided by the deployment of a slow zone that appeared to cost the Toyota.

    The #2 Cadillac consolidated third position after some quick stints from Alex Lynn and Richard Westbrook, although it continues to circulate 3m off the lead, making the race a two-horse battle between Ferrari and Toyota.

    Scott Dixon runs a lap down in the #3 Cadillac in fourth, Mikken Jensen holding fifth in the #93 Peugeot.

    Porsche’s challenge crumbled at the start of the 17th hour when Kevin Estre crashed the best of the three 963 LMDhs while trying to lap an LMP2 car.

    Running in fifth position behind the #3 Cadillac of Sebastien Bourdais, Estre made a mistake as he attempted to pass on one of the two WRT Orecas and went straight off at Porsche Curves, skating through the gravel before hitting the tyre barriers side-on.

    The Frenchman was able to reverse out of the barriers and rejoin the track but eventually had to bring the #6 Porsche back into the garage, where it spent a whopping 43 minutes undergoing repairs.

    It promoted the #5 car of Michael Christensen as the leading Porsche in sixth, albeit six laps down on the #51 Ferrari with six hours of racing remaining.

    #708 Glickenhaus Racing Glickenhaus 007 of Romain Dumas, Olivier Pla, Ryan Briscoe

    #708 Glickenhaus Racing Glickenhaus 007 of Romain Dumas, Olivier Pla, Ryan Briscoe

    Photo by: Marc Fleury

    Both Glickenhaus cars suffered crashes in the 18th hour, with Olivier Pla going wide at the exit of Indianapolis and slamming the barriers on the inside of the corner in the #708, before Franck Mailleux had a similar – but slightly less impactful – shunt in the sister #709 car.

    Both drivers were to rejoin the race, albeit with some damage to their cars.

    In LMP2, InterEuropol continues to hold the class lead despite the best efforts of Robert Kubica in the #41 WRT to snatch the top spot.

    Now driven by Albert Costa, the #34 InterEuropol Oreca remains over 30s clear of the #41 WRT car piloted by Rui Andrade, with Job van Uitert moving the #65 Panis Racing ahead of the #30 Duqueine Oreca of Neel Jani in the battle for the final spot of the podium.

    The GTE Am saw a number of lead changes with the Kessel Racing Ferrari that had led in the hands of gentleman driver Takeshi Kimura dropping to seventh place.

    Kimura was passed by the #85 Iron Dames Porsche of Rahel Frey on the Mulsanne Straight in the 17th hour, with Frey staying in the car to strengthen the lead of the all-female crew.

    Second place is held by the #25 ORT by TF Aston Martin of Charlie Eastwood, who overtook the #33 Corvette of Ben Keating just before the end of the 18th hour.

    Meanwhile, Mike Rockenfeller runs 29th overall in the Garage 56 Chevrolet Camaro, ahead of all GTE Am runners in the field.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The latest numbers on the microchip shortage: More cuts worldwide

    The latest numbers on the microchip shortage: More cuts worldwide

    [ad_1]

    Assembly plants in each auto-building region of the world cut vehicles from their production schedules because of microchip shortages last week, according to AutoForecast Solutions.

    Plants in China were the most impacted, with 14,013 vehicles lost due to a lack of semiconductors. 

    Still, the total number of vehicles expected to be cut by year’s end stayed steady at about 2.82 million — a sign that the chip situation is slowly improving, if “sometimes painfully so,” said Sam Fiorani, AutoForecast Solutions vice president of global vehicle forecasting.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • GTE drivers “gutted” class will no longer be part of Le Mans

    GTE drivers “gutted” class will no longer be part of Le Mans

    [ad_1]

    GTE cars have featured in the World Endurance Championship since its rebirth in 2012 but, from next year, will be replaced by the new LMGT3 class.

    The GTE Pro division was already axed for 2023 amid dwindling numbers, leaving only the GTE Am division that will also disappear at the end of this season.

    Despite a plethora of manufacturers having GT3 machines – with Ford revealing its new Mustang GT3 on Friday – and interest in the new class high, drivers have lamented the end of the GTE era.

    Charlie Eastwood, who won the GTE Am class at Le Mans with a TF Sport Aston Martin in 2020 and is starting second for this year’s race, believes the presence of ABS on GT3 cars will diminish the driving challenge.

    “I’m absolutely gutted,” he told Autosport about the demise of GTE. “I drive round here and I know GT3 will just never feel the same.

    “For me, ABS takes out 80% of the driving for the driver and what made qualifying so difficult was going from the highest speeds the GTE can go to right down to the lowest at the chicanes.

    “You’re on the verge of missing the corner and that’s the bit that, when you then get to the line, it’s so satisfying.

    “I have no doubt the racing is still going to be incredible [with GT3], but I absolutely love the GTE.”

     

    His thoughts are echoed by Ben Keating, the polesitter for this year’s GTE Am race with Corvette Racing and one of the leading bronze-graded amateurs, winning at Le Mans in 2022 in a TF Aston.

    “In WEC, a bronze driver’s time behind the wheel really makes a big difference in the race,” he told Autosport. “Without ABS, the difference between bronze drivers is much higher.

    “With GTE, there’s a huge risk that if you lock up you’re going in the wall or you flat spot a tyre. You can ruin the race with one lock-up, so you have to be more conservative.

    “If you go to GT3, you have ABS and I want to learn being closer to the Pro, I don’t want the computer to do it for me.

    “I have a little pain in my heart it’s going away because it’s such a special part of history.”

    Read Also:

    Keating, a LMP2 regular in the IMSA SportsCar Championship, is instead evaluating a return to the LMP2 category at Le Mans for next year, after previous entries in 2016-17.

    However, Kessel Racing Ferrari driver Daniel Serra – who has taken two GTE Pro victories at Le Mans in both Ferrari and Aston machinery – still believes the GT3s will be great to drive around the La Sarthe circuit.

    “I’m trying to enjoy as much as I can this last dance with the GTE, but I know next year it will be an amazing car as well with the 296 that I’m driving and developing,” he told Autosport.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Detroit auto show vows to make a comeback in 2023. But which automakers can the show lure back?

    Detroit auto show vows to make a comeback in 2023. But which automakers can the show lure back?

    [ad_1]

    Organizers are promising that the 2023 North American International Detroit Auto Show will feature more brand participation and vehicle reveals than last year, although it’s unclear which companies plan to return to the mid-September event.

    The Detroit Auto Dealers Association, which runs the show, said the 2023 version will include a new indoor track for electric vehicles, more outdoor ride-and-drives and a new mobility forum featuring executives and politicians such as Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. They vowed “multiple vehicle debuts” and “double” the brands that participated last year, which was the first Detroit show to attempt an indoor-outdoor format.

    Brand representatives for VW, Audi, Mazda, Jaguar, Land Rover, Kia, Hyundai, Genesis, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Porsche, Volvo, Subaru, Lexus, Polestar and Lucid told Automotive News they would not have a stand at this year’s show, while Honda has previously said it would delegate future show duties to local dealers. The loss of Subaru is notable, as it was among the few non-Detroit automakers to attend last year.

    The dealers association said last week that hometown companies General Motors, Stellantis and Ford Motor Co. will participate with their full brand portfolios, which each of the automakers confirmed. A Stellantis spokesperson said the automaker will hold two press conferences, while GM and Ford did not specify.

    A Toyota brand spokesperson also confirmed it would have a presence at the show, as it did last year, but does not plan a press conference.

    The media preview will take place Sept. 13-14, with the annual charity preview happening Sept. 15. The show will be open to the public Sept. 16-24.

    “This year’s show represents the next step in its evolution and in the evolution of the industry itself,” auto show Chairman Thad Szott said in a statement. “Automotive technology is changing so rapidly; how do we make people comfortable with it? We’re planning for a show that not only embraces and educates about this new technology but offers an immersion into it. And with twice the number of brands participating, there’ll be no shortage of engaging with it.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why Section 45X is a ‘game changer’ for U.S. EV battery supply chain

    Why Section 45X is a ‘game changer’ for U.S. EV battery supply chain

    [ad_1]

    Automakers also are expected to benefit from 45X, though it remains to be seen whether the credits are used to lower EV prices for consumers.

    In a third-quarter earnings call in October, Ford CEO Jim Farley estimated that a combined available tax credit for Ford and its battery partners in 2023-26 could total more than $7 billion, with a “large step up in annual credits” starting in 2027 as battery plants ramp up to full production.

    However, the Alliance for Automotive Innovation is seeking clarity from Treasury to ensure that companies making or assembling the final battery component installed on the vehicle — whether a pack or module — are eligible for the $10 credit.

    Giving the module credit to the manufacturer that installs the battery in the vehicle will “increase the likelihood that the 45X credit will be passed along to consumers,” the group, which represents Ford and other major automakers, said in recent comments to Treasury.

    An analysis by Energy Innovation and the International Council on Clean Transportation found that on average over the 2023-32 period, the 45X tax credit could reduce light-duty EV purchase costs by up to $2,900 depending on how much of it is passed on to consumers in the form of reduced upfront prices.

    Conrad Layson, senior alternative propulsion analyst at AutoForecast Solutions, is not so optimistic.

    “Part of me says that prices will rise and adjust simply because of the ways the laws of demand work,” he said. If a company has battery components or critical minerals that are compliant with Inflation Reduction Act rules, “that’s worth something at a premium.”

    It also depends on supply chain resilience, said Nathan Niese, associate director of electrification and climate change at Boston Consulting Group.

    “With a whole new set of demand coming in — faster than otherwise might have been naturally expected — can the supply chains keep up?” he said. “If they can’t, then you have a supply shortage, and it only takes one or a subset of materials to drive prices up on batteries again.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Friday favourite: The Le Mans-winning Sauber behind a heroic solo drive

    Friday favourite: The Le Mans-winning Sauber behind a heroic solo drive

    [ad_1]

    The unmistakable rumble of the Sauber-Mercedes C9’s V8 was the soundtrack to a breakout year in Kenneth Acheson’s racing career. Two wins in the 1989 World Sports Prototype Championship and second at the Le Mans 24 Hours marked a remarkable return to the international racing scene for the Ulsterman, who had four years earlier struggled with desperately uncompetitive Formula 1 machinery before making a career in Japan that put his name back on the map.

    Acheson points out that the honour bestowed by Autosport readers in voting it as the Racing Car of the Year in 1989 must have made the C9 pretty special, and that it most certainly was. Having just been pipped to the title in 1988 by Martin Brundle’s Jaguar XJR-9, Jean-Louis Schlesser made amends in 1989 to see off Acheson’s co-driver Mauro Baldi in a season-long fight as the Swiss operation was only beaten once in eight world championship rounds by Joest’s 962 at Dijon when tyre preservation played a significant role in the result.

    “That whole year was great,” says Acheson. “Dave Price ran that car, I got on well with Mauro [Baldi], the team was just an incredibly nice place to be where they were competitive and very good at what they did. The car was a pleasure to drive.”

    Such was its impact that for Acheson the C9 even usurps “the only car I’ve driven and realised I’d got a smile on my face”. The 1987 Japanese Group C champion believes the Toyota TS010 in which he again finished second at Le Mans in 1992 had the edge on Peugeot for pace the following year, “but our reliability just fell apart”.

    “It was just ridiculously fast compared to what we’d driven before,” Acheson says of the Toyota, which “gripped like you wouldn’t believe”.

    Acheson’s first outing with the C9 in 1988 was curtailed when an unexplained tyre blowout for team-mate Klaus Niedzwiedz prompted Sauber to withdraw. But he was asked back for the Fuji 1000km WSPC round, sharing with Schlesser and Jochen Mass. He led during the race but delays caused by a loss of boost and subsequent repairs, attributed to a loose bolt in the turbo wastegate, cost four laps and limited their C9 to fifth at the flag. However Acheson had made enough of an impression to contest the full 1989 season and Le Mans, now a non-championship event.

    Acheson was accepting of his number two role, which in the fuel-limited Group C formula meant he was the foil responsible for keeping the car in contention during the middle stint without abusing his consumption. A difficult tightrope to walk, but one which in the C9 he didn’t find an arduous task.

    The Toyota TS010 is the only car that ever knowingly brought a smile to Acheson’s face while driving it – but can’t match the C9

    Photo by: William Murenbeeld / Motorsport Images

    “In my mind it was [Baldi’s] car, it was always he was going to start the races and my job was to fill in the gaps,” says Acheson. “Whenever I was needed to make a difference, I think I was always able to do that. But certainly I was never somebody who would go and use up too much fuel, I was always sensible with fuel.

    “I wasn’t their person to be starting the race or to set the car up for what I wanted. I wasn’t their person to have the same amount of laps in practice and qualifying. I didn’t feel I had to make it a big deal and maybe that’s why at the end of the year they probably thought I wasn’t driven enough, maybe I didn’t create enough trouble. But Jochen was very similar with Schlesser, he was more or less always second driver as well and never dropped the ball. That in my mind is what I saw my job being.

    “I didn’t have to really be in the spotlight that much, I was quite happy quietly getting on and doing a good job. And I think that’s part of the reason why people did choose me, to be a team player.”

    “With the Mercedes we just always drove to the fuel or very slightly over it and I remember early on for the first dozen or 15 laps it was really difficult to overtake. Then when they have to settle down, I made real progress” Kenneth Acheson

    Acheson fulfilled all those criteria and more in the opening round of 1989 at Suzuka, which he selected as the race of his life in the 11 September 2014 issue of Autosport. Driving the 480km race solo in an unfamiliar car, he came through from 30th to the lead before heeding team orders to finish second.

    The #62 entry was qualified by Schlesser and Mass, the latter only setting a nominal time after crashing in the wet on his second flying lap. Schlesser (who had qualified 10th) was moved across to join Baldi in #61 when the team doctor advised Mass – who was struggling with his vision – to withdraw and so Acheson took his place, having not driven his race chassis until warmup.

    “Circumstances were thrown upon me,” he says.

    Acheson recalls that Suzuka “was actually the first race that we used carbon brakes”, which hadn’t previously managed a race distance. The decision to run them was made in the expectation that there was nothing to lose if Acheson couldn’t physically last the distance – a point he too had doubts about.

    Acheson reckons that his wealth of track knowledge “would have helped a little bit” on a circuit that “was a lot bumpier than it is now” and retained the old “more intimidating” 130R, but reckons it was more a matter of patiently managing his pace.

    Mass joined him for the podium but played no part in the race as Acheson drove a stellar solo race to second at Suzuka in 1989

    Mass joined him for the podium but played no part in the race as Acheson drove a stellar solo race to second at Suzuka in 1989

    Photo by: Sutton Images

    “Maybe it helped more coming through the field because certainly early on it was very hard to overtake as a lot of the Porsches in the first stint would run a lot higher boost,” he says. “With the Mercedes we just always drove to the fuel or very slightly over it and I remember early on for the first dozen or 15 laps it was really difficult to overtake. Then when they have to settle down, I made real progress.

    “But I lost a load of time in the first dozen or 15 laps because I just couldn’t pass traffic. Everybody is racing and going mad and lots of boost, up and down, you just had to be patient. But the car was quick and I came through.”

    He never dipped under the 2m00s barrier during the first third of the race and progressed to ninth by lap 20, while others had to back off after charging too soon. By lap 48, Acheson had moved up to second and was in good shape, having taken 10 litres more fuel than Baldi-Schlesser at the first stops. He then closed significantly after the second stops on Schlesser, who had to stop for longer, and circulated 2-3s per lap faster before passing on lap 64.

    “I obviously knew that I’d be asked to give it back, which I didn’t have a problem with,” relates Acheson. “It was the right thing for the team. I was the new guy in the car, I was definitely the number two driver. When I got asked, I slowed down in front of the pits so that everyone at least knew that I had been leading!”

    Back with Baldi in #61 for the rest of the season, Acheson led briefly through traffic at Dijon before being hamstrung behind the slow-moving Almeras Porsche in the pits and dropping behind the #62 machine. He then did the bulk of the driving at Le Mans, where time lost to an off while Baldi was at the wheel combined with gearbox dramas allowed the Le Mans-only #63 entry of Mass, Manuel Reuter and Stanley Dickens to lead home Acheson, Baldi and Gianfranco Brancatelli in a 1-2.

    PLUS: How Sauber upset the odds to win Le Mans

    Acheson rates his first Le Mans start in three attempts – in 1985 the John Fitzpatrick 962C he’d been due to share with Schlesser and Dudley Wood was destroyed when Wood crashed in practice and vaulted the barrier on the Mulsanne Straight – as one of his stronger drives that year, although it left him with sore eyes for the following WSPC round at Jarama.

    “I wasn’t probably at my best at Jarama,” he reckons of a race he spun on his second lap out of the pits, with an inconsistent feeling in the brakes implicated. That was later validated as the car later lost three laps while the system was bled in the final pitstop.

    Acheson reaffirmed a gap built up by Baldi prior to a safety car en-route to their first win at Brands Hatch, before a frustrating day at the Nurburgring where the #61 car proved puzzlingly thirstier than the sister Sauber. Baldi was already over on his fuel allocation when he handed over to Acheson, who could do nothing to get back into the lead fight against Schlesser and Mass. “A bit messy,” is his memory of the event.

    Acheson and Baldi led home C9 1-2 at Brands Hatch

    Acheson and Baldi led home C9 1-2 at Brands Hatch

    Photo by: Motorsport Images

    Second again to their team-mates at Donington, Acheson upheld his end of the bargain at Spa on his first visit to the track since his Formula 2 days – despite precious little dry weather running in practice – to secure a second win of the season, but it wasn’t enough to keep his drive.

    Acheson knew before the Mexico finale that he wasn’t going to stay on for the arrival of the C11 in 1990. Mercedes was in the throes of setting up its young driver programme to develop Formula 3 drivers Karl Wendlinger, Heinz-Harald Frentzen and Michael Schumacher. “Obviously it was a bit disappointing,” is Acheson’s view, although he says he can understand Mercedes motorsport boss Jochen Neerpasch’s thinking.

    “I never really had a problem with that, I could understand it because by then my career wasn’t going to go forward,” he says. “Basically I was happy doing what I was doing, I was a really good second driver but they had the opportunity to bring in three young guys and they all did really well. And I guess my claim to fame is I got sacked for Michael Schumacher, you can’t really complain about that!”

    “I don’t sit at home and think bad about it. I actually sit at home and think I had a really good weekend other than that!” Kenneth Acheson

    Determined to bow out in style and secure the title for Baldi, who was five points behind Schlesser (although ahead before dropped scores) heading into the race, Acheson was on a tear in Mexico City. He reckons “that was the only weekend that Mauro was probably a bit slower than me” and attributes it to the knowledge he wouldn’t be returning for the following year meaning “I didn’t have to try and please everybody, which I guess through the year I was always trying to do”.

    Acheson took over before Mass, hunted him down and passed on the pit straight for the lead.

    He recalls: “I remember Pricey saying to me, ‘You just have to try and get ahead of Jochen and then hold him and take it from there’. And that’s what I did. I did get past him, but by then my tyres were not great. So it was a matter of trying to control that Jochen couldn’t pass me.”

    Approaching Peraltada, Acheson could see Tiff Needell’s Richard Lloyd Porsche up ahead and “backed off because I knew if I caught him halfway through the corner Jochen would just pass me halfway down the straight”.

    “I backed off to give myself a really good run,” explains Acheson, “but I probably mis-timed the run by a couple of car-lengths. So just as I came to the bump I think his downforce interfered a little bit and the car just spun.”

    The back end stepped out and there was little Acheson could do. He was spat into the tyres barriers on the outside, the impact causing heavy damage to the front end of the chassis. In the blink of an eye, the title race was over, Acheson no less gutted than Baldi.

    The 1989 WSPC title went down to the wire in Mexico, where a crash for Acheson handed the crown to Schlesser

    The 1989 WSPC title went down to the wire in Mexico, where a crash for Acheson handed the crown to Schlesser

    Photo by: Motorsport Images

    “It was disappointing, but I don’t have a problem with what I did or anything like that,” he says. “Obviously I felt sorry for Mauro, but everybody in the team – even Neerpasch said, ‘that was why you were there, you were excellent’. So they didn’t have a problem with me crashing, I crashed the car because I was trying to win the race so my team-mate could be world champion. That’s the way it is and obviously it didn’t work out.

    “I don’t sit at home and think bad about it. I actually sit at home and think I had a really good weekend other than that!”

    Fortunately for Acheson, that wasn’t to be his final outing in a C9. He was reunited with the car, an unraced chassis built up from spare parts, after a chance outing with its owner, historics racer Rupert Clevely, at the Goodwood Festival of Speed. That prompted Acheson to make a brief run in the car at Turweston airfield for an article in Motorsport magazine, before Acheson agreed to purchase the car “about a year or so later”.

    “When you sit in it, it’s just normal, like you were in it a couple of months ago,” says Acheson of a car that had previously been part of the Donington Collection. He has changed the livery so it now wears his 1989 Le Mans colours, complete with his #61: “It’s nice to take it out, I got invited to Goodwood [Festival of Speed] a couple of years ago [in 2021].”

    But perhaps unsurprisingly, it’s Suzuka 1989 that Acheson picks out as his C9 highlight today.

    “The two wins are nice to have, and I suppose you can say ‘I won a world sportscar race’ but to be honest finishing second at Suzuka was probably to me personally as good,” he says. “It was always nice to win because it showed that you could, but I know the races that I did well.

    “The overriding thing is I was just really fortunate to be picked by Sauber to race the car that year. Even when I got picked, I couldn’t believe I was picked! I was in Japan and I was doing a good job but nobody in Europe knew me, so to get that [drive] and have a year with it was really good.

    “And it was absolutely the nicest team I have ever driven for. You had just a real culture of getting on with it and everybody knew they were good at it. My overriding memory is just I was bloody lucky to be able to drive it and to be able to drive in that team.”

    Today Acheson has an example of the C9 he drove to second at Le Mans in 1989

    Today Acheson has an example of the C9 he drove to second at Le Mans in 1989

    Photo by: Rainer W. Schlegelmilch / Motorsport Images

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Toyota Building More GR86 Coupes For UK Buyers

    Toyota Building More GR86 Coupes For UK Buyers

    [ad_1]

    The order books for the Toyota GR86 opened in the United Kingdom on April 20 last year but closed just 90 minutes later. The sports coupe’s entire two-year run in the UK was sold out within just an hour and a half with no plans for additional production at the time. Now, however, the Japanese firm finally makes the GR86 available again and this time around, it will use a chronological purchasing process.

    When Toyota closed the order banks last year, it still had a long waiting list of potential customers who signed for the then-new GR86. “In the spirit of fairness,” Toyota says, the new online purchasing process will be based on chronological order – those who placed pre-orders first will be the first to get the chance to buy the sports coupe now. If another sell-out situation occurs, Toyota will continue to operate a waiting list with potential customers for future production plans.

    Just like in April last year, Toyota doesn’t want to reveal how many GR86 coupes are destined for the UK in this new allocation but it anticipates this second production run will also be a quick sell-out for the company. According to Carwow, fewer than 500 units of the model were allocated for the UK market originally. The new production run will probably be capped at around the same number but this hasn’t been confirmed.

    For the new model year, Toyota wants 32,495 British pounds for the GR86 in the United Kingdom, which is around $40,767 with the current exchange rates. Last year, that price was 30,140 ($37,813). In the United States, the 2023 GR86 starts at $29,495 with destination and handling taxes included. 

    To a certain extent, especially in the UK, the Toyota GR86 doesn’t have an alternative in the affordable sports car segment. Under the hood is a high-revving 2.4-liter flat-four engine making 228 horsepower (170 kilowatts) and 184 pound-feet (249 Newton-meters) of torque, enough for a 0-60 miles per hour sprint in just 6.1 seconds. Still, it costs significantly less than any equivalent hot hatch or sports coupe.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Soaring EV sales could still leave world short on emissions goal

    Soaring EV sales could still leave world short on emissions goal

    [ad_1]

    After a plodding start, EVs are now spreading rapidly as automakers from General Motors to Volkswagen Group are forced to keep pace with tightening emissions regulation, retooling factories to turn out a wide variety of battery models with attractive driving ranges.

    Countries are now competing to attract investments to build new manufacturing clusters — mainly battery cell plants but also mining, processing and recycling operations.

    In the U.S., so far a slow mover in the electric transition, President Joe Biden’s package of generous clean-technology subsidies is turbo-charging spending.

    The share of EVs in the country will more than triple by 2026 to 28 percent of passenger-vehicle sales, according to BNEF.

    EVs will be even more prevalent in China and Europe, where their share will climb to 52 percent and 42 percent, respectively.

    The shift to battery power, already displacing 1.5 million barrels of oil a day, will cause road fuel demand to peak in four years. That is ratcheting up pressure elsewhere, with lithium ion battery prices rising for the first time last year.

    BNEF expects innovation to deliver new battery chemistries that are more resource-efficient and powerful.

    Even so, lithium could become a supply-chain risk if no new discoveries are made over the next two decades and more investments are needed.

    Hydrogen’s role in decarbonizing big rigs, offering fast refueling times and transportability, remains uncertain due to its cost, BNEF said.

    To get to BNEF’s net zero scenario, investments in charging infrastructure are set to reach as much as $3 trillion by 2050.

    Reaching the last 10 percent to 20 percent of the market is particularly challenging, according to the report.

    “Support for charging infrastructure needs to be expanded dramatically, including for remote and otherwise under-served locations,” BNEF writes.

    “Dense public charging networks can help reduce the EV range consumers feel they need, which will in turn reduce pressure on battery raw material supplies.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Magazine: F1 Spanish GP review

    Magazine: F1 Spanish GP review

    [ad_1]

    On the one hand, we got exactly the winner we expected in Barcelona but, on the other, the track changes at the end of the lap made for more action and the revised Mercedes W14 suddenly came alive last Sunday.
    As Alex Kalinauckas explains in his weekly column and our in-depth report, there were several reasons why Mercedes jumped Aston Martin and Ferrari in Spain. Some of them were …Keep reading

    [ad_2]

    Source link